The new products from Anthropic have triggered a nearly trillion-dollar sell-off in enterprise software stocks, exposing the market's excessive panic over AI threats.
Barclays pointed out that investors have overlooked a key technological distinction: AI tools are indeed encroaching on the application layer business of SaaS companies, but they have yet to shake the underlying &#34;system of record&#34; infrastructure—which is precisely the core moat of enterprises like Salesforce and SAP.

The products released by Anthropic last week, such as Claude Cowork, became the last straw that broke the camel's back for enterprise software stocks. Customer relationship management software stock Salesforce and financial management software stock Workday have cumulatively fallen over 40% in the past 12 months.
Behind this panic sell-off is investors' fuzzy understanding of the boundaries of AI capabilities. The market generally believes that next-generation AI tools like Anthropic and OpenAI will completely replace traditional SaaS software, leading to the value of established companies dropping to zero.
According to a report released by Barclays on February 10 titled &#34;Software Is Not Dead, Just Changing,&#34; this &#34;one-size-fits-all&#34; simplistic logic does not apply to most enterprise software companies.
<h2>What AI Can and Cannot Do</h2>
The essential advantage of generative AI lies in pattern recognition and &#34;draft generation,&#34; but its probabilistic nature also constitutes a fundamental limitation. AI excels at tasks that require extracting patterns from vast amounts of data, such as natural language processing and code writing, but it struggles in scenarios that require absolute accuracy.
According to the Barclays report, traditional software operates based on deterministic rules, where the same input inevitably produces the same output. In contrast, AI software is fundamentally probabilistic, operating by learning behaviors rather than hard-coded logic, and cannot guarantee consistency in every output.
This means that AI operates at a higher level of abstraction and is not a replacement for traditional software.
This technical characteristic determines the applicable boundaries of AI. In fault-tolerant scenarios such as knowledge work and content generation, AI can replace or even surpass traditional SaaS applications; but in areas that require a &#34;single correct answer,&#34; such as billing processing, compliance auditing, and business rule execution, AI is still not up to the task.
Independent analyst Benedict Evans pointed out that successful SaaS products stem from mapping unique organizational problems into workflows and then encoding them into software. These long-accumulated customized business rules form the infrastructure of banks, hospitals, retailers, and other enterprises, and are the foundation of companies like Epic Systems and Oracle.
<h2>The Half That Was Wrongly Killed, &#34;System of Record&#34; Layer Is Hard to Replace</h2>
The Barclays report clearly states that three types of enterprise software companies have been mispriced in the sell-off and are worth re-evaluating by investors
First, there are system record companies. For example, Salesforce, as a customer relationship management system, holds the &#34;single truth&#34; about a company's customers and revenue—key data such as transaction progress, discount approvals, sales commissions, and revenue forecasts all require definitive answers.
SAP's position is even more solid. As a financial system record for enterprises, SAP CEO Christian Klein emphasized during the January earnings call that advanced generative AI models cannot handle the critical business data and workflows that companies rely on for survival.
Barclays believes that SAP is stickier than Salesforce because the irreplaceability of financial truths is stronger. Workday holds a similar position in the human resources and payroll fields.
AI will not replace these systems; rather, it will increase their importance. AI agents will create more data touchpoints, and the complexity that system records need to handle will rise accordingly. Barclays' research report points out, &#34;This means that the importance of these systems increases rather than their value going to zero, contrary to market views.&#34;
<h2>The data tools and AI computing power sectors are also misjudged by the market</h2>
In addition to system record companies, Barclays' report highlights two other categories of investment opportunities that the market has misjudged.
The second category is beneficiaries of AI agents. AI will bring more demand for code and data. Tools like JFrog (FROG), which manage software product versions and security, as well as data vendors like Snowflake (SNOW) and MongoDB (MDB), may see increased usage due to AI expansion.
The third category is AI computing providers. Here lies the biggest logical contradiction in the market. If AI is powerful enough to disrupt the entire software industry, the demand for computing power should logically surge, yet companies like Oracle and CoreWeave have suffered severe blows during sell-offs. &#34;There must be a problem here that warrants deeper investigation; market sentiment is overly pessimistic,&#34; wrote Barclays analysts.
<h2>Selling the right half, profits at the application layer are being squeezed</h2>
Market panic is not without reason. The application layer of SaaS companies, built on database infrastructure, has performed poorly for a long time: interfaces are clunky, not intuitive enough, prices are inflated, and there are sometimes security vulnerabilities. Worse still, customers are often locked into inferior systems due to high migration costs.
Matt Stoller, research director of the American Economic Freedom Project, wrote: &#34;The American software industry model is shaped around monopolization, providing low quality and poor security at high prices.&#34; He described a meeting in 2016 with community bankers, who criticized their niche software vendors as &#34;expensive&#34; and &#34;terrible.&#34;
Swedish fintech company Klarna will stop using Salesforce and Workday software in 2024, opting instead for products from smaller SaaS companies like Deel and Neo4j, and using the AI coding tool Cursor to build more modern application layers on top of them.
This reveals the true threat path of AI to SaaS: customers are not simply replacing SaaS software with AI tools, but rather building their own applications with AI, squeezing out the expensive interface layer while retaining the underlying data.
<h2>The Repricing of the Software Sector Will Continue</h2>
This market correction is necessary for the enterprise software application layer. SaaS companies have long enjoyed high valuation multiples because they control both the infrastructure and the interface. If the technologies of Anthropic and OpenAI can overlay on system records, it will begin to erode the pricing power of SaaS companies.
Barclays' research report summarizes: &#34;This means that the era of easily obtaining high profits for the bloated application layer of enterprise software may be coming to an end.&#34; However, this does not equate to the end of the entire industry. The key is to distinguish which companies rely on application layer profits and which companies' value is rooted in irreplaceable system record layers.
SAP's statements during the January earnings call represent the confidence of system record vendors. Other SaaS executives are also pushing back against bearish views. But the market needs time to digest these technical details and differentiate between genuine disruptive threats and exaggerated panic.
The indiscriminate nature of the current sell-off indicates that investors, such as those in the credit market who previously had limited understanding of the software industry, are making decisions based on the most extreme viewpoints.
As the understanding of the boundaries of AI capabilities and the business models of SaaS companies deepens, the market may reprice those companies that have been incorrectly categorized as &#34;AI victims.&#34; However, for those companies that have long relied on charging high fees for low-quality application layers, the valuation squeeze may just be beginning.

SOXL

SOXX

The trillion-dollar sell-off triggered by Anthropic has exposed market panic. Investors have misjudged the boundaries of AI's capabilities; while AI can erode the software application layer, it is difficult to shake the foundation of the "system record layer" that collects real data. Barclays' research report points out that the repricing of software stocks will continue, and investors need to distinguish which companies rely on application layer profits and which companies' value is rooted in the irreplaceable system record layer

- The recent release of Anthropic's AI products has triggered a significant sell-off among enterprise software stocks, with fears of AI overtaking traditional SaaS applications.  
- Barclays reports that this panic overlooks the distinction between AI tools eroding the application layer and the foundational "system record" infrastructure of companies like Salesforce and SAP.  
- The market correction is necessary, as it reflects a re-evaluation of which companies are genuinely at risk versus those with irreplaceable core systems, indicating a need for a clearer understanding of AI's capabilities and limits.

AI vs SaaS: Sell first, ask later, is the market "half right"?